Schematic of the HIV Viron Showing the gp120/gp140 Type I Fusion
Glycoprotein Assesmbly
Medicines are only useful to the extent that they can reach at-risk populations. Unfortunately, when it comes to some of the world's most deadly viruses, sending effective vaccines into the developing world has proved difficult. Luckily, a new generation of vaccines, the subunit vaccines, promises improved access for men, women, and children living beyond the reach of the refrigeration "cold-chain" that has traditionally limited distribution. That subunit vaccines are also safer and less expensive than other varieties has made them the focus of intense research efforts that are beginning to bear fruit. Recent work from the Vaccine Research Center (VRC) at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases published in the journal Nature, for example, describes a strategy that could be used to bring subunit vaccines for diseases like HIV, influenza and respiratory syncytial virus into reach.
Vaccines work by offering the body a "sneak peak"
at pathogens-disease causing microorganism-that it might later encounter in a
less controlled setting. This is true whether the goal is provide protection
against a viral or a bacterial species. Immunization allows the immune system
to build the infrastructure needed to recognize and neutralize the relevant
pathogen should you becomes infected. The recognition process follows from the
ways that the surfaces of foreign microorganisms differ from the surfaces of an
individual's own anatomical structures. Therefore, vaccines need only expose
the body to the surface structures of pathogens, not their entire construction.
This is the logic behind subunit vaccines: identify and vaccinate patients with
key elements of pathogen surfaces that the immune system can rely on to recognize
those foreign substances. The prominent structural elements here are typically
proteins, an important class of biomolecules. Like anything else in science,
this if often easier said then done.
The keys to crafting an effective subunit vaccine are
twofold. First, researchers must identify a structure or group of structures on
the pathogen surface that are unique among other microorganisms but common to
all or many of the strains of the target microorganism. These structures must
be found to act as immunogens that
lead to immune responses that are both strong and protective against various
strains. Second, researchers must find a way to stabilize the identified structures,
which in their native environments on bacterial or viral surfaces might be
supported by interactions with other structures. It is this stabilization that
the VRC's findings might simplify in the future. By fusing viral surface
proteins to rigid assemblies of the protein ferritin,
VRC scientists discovered a method for stabilizing the surface structures that
that may advance HIV, RSV, and influenza vaccine efforts. No vaccine for HIV or
RSV is availible; a subunit vaccine for influenza could protect against more
stains than do currently available formulations.
What do HIV, RSV and influenza have in common such that
their vaccine efforts are linked? All three viruses display on their surfaces
protein structures known as type I fusion glycoproteins (TIFGs). In all three
cases, TIFGs occur in groups of three that are arranged as tripods. It is thought
that these tripods, formally known as trimers,
will acts as effective immunogens. What has been proven difficult, however, is
holding groups of TIFGs together as trimers where they are not connected to entire
viruses. Work at the VRC has shown that it is possible to attach TIFGs to
assemblies of the bacterial protein ferritin in a way that will stabilize them
in trimeric configurations. Twenty-four ferritin molecules come together to
form a ball-shaped nanoparticle whose
surface hosts eight locations that can each connect to one TIFG trimer. When
scientists express (create) proteins for use in subunit vaccines they do so
artificially and in a manner completely separate from the organism in which the
protein naturally occurs. This being the case, a subunit vaccine that combines
bacterial ferritin assemblies with TIFGs isolated from HIV, RSV or influenza
has the ability to infect an individual with no bacterial or viral
disease.
Whether efforts to create clinically useful ferritin
nanoparticle vaccines for viruses that host TIFGs on their surfaces will be
successful has yet to be seen. In their Nature
article, authors from the VRC present a nanoparticle vaccine that offers
strong protection against various influenza strains. Their construct, however,
has yet to be tested in humans or even in large pools of animals. While the subunit
approach has appeal as a way to create effective, safe, inexpensive and
distributable vaccines, the human body is a complex machine whose reaction to a
foreign substance is difficult to predict. Whether new ferritin nanoparticle
vaccines are safe for widespread use should become clear during the years-long
process of clinical testing that must precede marketing.
NIH Vaccine Info Link: http://www.vaccines.gov/more_info/types/#subunit
See: Kanekiyo M, Wei
CJ, Yassine HM, McTammney PM, Boyington JC, Whittle JRR, Rao SS, Kong WP, Wang
L, Nabel GJ. Self-assembling influenza nanoparticle vaccines elicit broadly
neutralizing H1N1 antibodies. 2013. Nature. 499: 102-106.
Image Credit: NIAID. HIV
Viron Structure. 2010. Digital Image. Flickr.
Yahoo! Inc. Web. 6 March 2015. < https://www.flickr.com/photos/niaid/5080768345/in/photolist-bGyEX-8Dzz22-c1h9K9-9yAr3e-hiCNVA-896Don-8GSyC4-8TUEm5-aRwNc4-pbcQYr-7fuCyB-8fYoYE-fAfySA-8CWtKR-8CJbyd-6TzA7P-7S5A18-ewXXK1-8JYgqe-ewXXGW-8DPVSb-3bEcxA-aN9ZBR-97GD84-aN9Zp8-88XcAr-bo55zH-8wNGmZ-7uFUDn-4mkiXQ-77VqAw-9vmf4X-9ApBzB-9bV8Dq-4pycVt-3WU1bF-624rq-8CJbxY-fomL-8CGVWs-8DNhY8-9dHfxP-8mNuXa-8CDgXZ-8CJbxJ-aRZt4t-afRKUN-8e28LT-aXqSAc-i3m2Ak>.
You make a really good point when ask "whether the artificial proteins cause the desired immune response." Anytime scientists build chimeric assemblies like the ones presented here, they need to be worried about the effects of immune responses directed against both the viral proteins and the nanoparticle proteins. In the Kanekiyo, et al. study that I cited, the authors were worried that the use of bacterial ferritins might lead to autoimmunity problems due to targeting of ferritin molecules native to the mice they immunized. They didn't find any evidence of such induced autoimmunity in this case, but who knows whether it might be an obstacle for future nanoparticle-based vaccines.
ReplyDeleteAs someone who is not very familiar with vaccines this idea of using small sub-units of the disease to vaccinate is incredible. I also like how safe it appears since it is using just very small components to help combat HIV. This safety component is crucial when dealing with something as dangerous as HIV.
ReplyDelete